Last published on: 7 October 2026 at 15:23 UTC
This question set collects information regarding the legal entity that would enter into a Registry Agreement with ICANN upon successful completion of all relevant application processes. The information collected is intended to be used for background screening.
Provide the full legal name of the applying entity as it appears on the official registration documents. Do not use abbreviations.
NISSIN FOODS HOLDINGS CO.,LTD.
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the applying entity as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation. No additional information should be provided as this will be used for the automatic population of the Registry Agreement.
Company Limited
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the applying entity is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the applying entity is registered. No additional information should be provided as this will be used for the automatic population of the Base Registry Agreement. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Japan
Provide the website URL of the applying entity, if available.
https://www.nissin.com/
1. Choose Yes or No. 2. Use the definition of Affiliate from the Base Registry Agreement (see https://www.icann.org/en/registry-agreements/base-agreement).
false
Choose Yes or No.
false
1. If the applying entity is publicly traded, provide its stock symbol. 2. If the applying entity is traded under multiple symbols/tickers, provide the symbol of the entity's primary equity listing that has the most units outstanding.
2897
1. If the applying entity is publicly traded, select the Stock Exchange with which the applying entity is listed. 2. If the applying entity is traded on multiple exchanges, provide the exchange of the entity's primary equity listing.
Japan Exchange Group, Inc.
81
Provide the primary business phone number without including the country code.
03-3205-5111
Provide the primary business email address of the applying entity.
registry@brandsecurity.gmo
Enter the street address (no PO Box).
4-1-1 Nishinakajima
Enter the city, village, municipality, etc.
Yodogawa-ku
Enter the state, province, department, territory, prefecture, oblast, etc., if applicable.
Osaka
1. Enter the postal code, if applicable. 2. If a postal code does not exist, type “Not Applicable”.
532-8524
JP
This question set collects information related to the individuals who will have access to TAMS, manage the application, and receive inquiries.
Koki Ando, Noritaka Ando, Mitsuru Tanaka, Ken Kobayashi, Keita Ishii, Masato Mizuno, Eietsu Sakuraba, Yuka Fujimura, Keiko Yamaguchi, Kumiko Shimamoto, Masahiko Sawai, Akihiro Hashimoto, Ayumi Michi, Toshihiko Ijichi
Makiko Hamase, Yukio Yokoyama, Kiyotaka Ando, Akira Sato, Akihiro Toyotome, Kyo Nishikawa, Sumihito Endo, Munehiko Ono, Kimihiko Kamiwada, Shiho Koizumi, Kazuhiro Gono, Kensuke Tojima, Toshihiro Narita, Kanade Hanamoto, Hiromichi Funane, Masahiro Homma, Kenji Maeda, Hiroshi Masaki, Takashi Yano, Michiaki Yamada, Yoichi Yoshida
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q3.2-1. The document must include only the SC3.2-1.1, SC3.2-1.2, SC3.2-1.3 and SC3.2-1.4 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q3.2-1. 2. The document must include only the SC3.2-1.1 through SC3.2-1.4 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC3.2-1.1 through SC3.2-1.4 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC3.2-1.1 through SC3.2-1.4 statements.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question AGB Q220, Q5.1-1. The document must include only the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. If the applicant cannot Self-Certify SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q5.1-1. 2. The document must include only the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1.1-3 statements.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question AGB Q221, Q5.2-1. The document must include only the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. If the applicant cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q5.2-1. 2. The document must include only the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements.
This question set collects basic information regarding the string that is being applied for (for example, a-label, meaning, script). If the applying entity opts to designate a replacement string, it must answer the same set of questions for the replacement string from the AGB Question Set 5 on.
nissin
Provide the meaning, or restatement of the string in English, that is, a description of the literal meaning of the string in the opinion of the applying entity. If there is no literal meaning in English (for example, a brand name or a proper noun without a translation) simply state "No English Translation"
“NISSIN” is the applicant’s corporate name and house brand. The applicant has used the NISSIN name as its corporate name since 1958. The string has no geographic meaning and has become widely recognized as identifying the applicant and its products.
If an IDN, provide the script of the string (both in English and as referenced by the RZ-LGR/ISO 15924)
Latin
Provide a representation of the string according to the International Phonetic Alphabet.
[ˈnɪsɪn]
Confirm the statement using a checkbox.
true
1. Describe the mission and purpose of the applied-for gTLD, including the intended registrants and users, and the related activities that have been or will be carried out to achieve this purpose. 1a. If applying for a variant of an existing gTLD, please also describe the mission and purpose of the existing gTLD, including the intended registrants and users, and the related activities that have been or will be carried out to achieve this purpose. 2. Explain how this purpose is sustainable over time.
The .nissin top-level domain is intended to benefit Internet users by enabling NISSIN FOODS HOLDINGS CO., LTD. (hereinafter "The Company") to communicate more easily and securely with Internet users, and particularly with its consumers, customers, employees and affiliates. The TLD will serve as a dedicated branding, technology and services platform for The Company's mission and its stakeholders. Mission and purpose. NISSIN FOODS HOLDINGS CO., LTD. is a corporation headquartered at 4-1-1 Nishinakajima, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka-shi, Japan. It is a holding company whose registered purpose is to engage in the businesses set out below and to control and manage, through the ownership of shares or equity interests, companies and other business entities engaged in them, together with management consulting for group companies and services relating to the acquisition, maintenance, licensing and assignment of intellectual property rights. Those businesses include the manufacture, processing and sale of groceries, beverages, seasonings and food products; the production and sale of agricultural, livestock, forestry and fishery products; food packaging and containers; research and evaluation of safety and quality in the food industry; the manufacture and sale of chemicals, pharmaceutical products, cosmetics, food additives, animal feed and fertilizer; transportation, freight forwarding and warehousing; real property and leisure facilities; advertising; securities and financial business; publishing; software development; food information services; and worker dispatching and food refrigeration. "nissin" is the Company's own corporate name and corporate brand. The purpose of the .nissin TLD is to provide a trusted, exclusively controlled namespace — operated by or on behalf of The Company — for the exchange of information among The Company and its stakeholders via websites, applications, email and other online services within the .nissin space. Consolidating the group's online presence under a single authoritative TLD gives users a reliable signal of authenticity and reduces the risk of phishing, spoofing and brand abuse. That assurance matters particularly for a food manufacturing group, whose consumers rely on its online channels for product, ingredient and safety information. Intended registrants and users. .nissin is a single-registrant ".brand" TLD operated under ICANN Registry Agreement Specification 13. The Company will be the sole registrant: it initially intends to reserve all names within the TLD for itself and to register and use second-level domains for its own purposes and those of its group companies. Any third-party use would occur only under contract with The Company and under its control. Activities to achieve this purpose. The Company will use .nissin domains for its corporate, brand and product websites, consumer- and customer-facing services, secure communications and email, and may provide related services such as hosting, content delivery and marketing under the TLD. The .nissin TLD extends and protects the group's established Internet presence under a namespace it fully controls. Sustainability over time. The Company was incorporated on September 4, 1948 and has operated continuously since, and it holds and manages the group's food manufacturing and related businesses. The .nissin TLD is intended as long-term infrastructure for that business, not as a speculative or transitional namespace, and The Company intends to operate it for the full term of the Registry Agreement and to renew it thereafter. Competition, differentiation and innovation. .nissin does not compete with existing generic TLDs for registrations, because it is not open to third-party registration. It differentiates the group's authentic online presence from look-alike domains in open TLDs, and lets The Company design a namespace whose structure reflects its own products, brands and organisation rather than the constraints of a shared registry.
This question set collects information related to determining whether certain Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (Safeguard PICs) are required for the applied-for gTLD string. See Section 7.8.2.3 Safeguard PICs. Answers to these questions will inform assessment by ICANN on whether and which Safeguard PICs must be incorporated in the applicable Registry Agreement (RA) if the string proceeds to delegation. The answers themselves will not automatically make such a determination.
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. I-2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. I-2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
Select Yes or No. Notes: 1. ICANN will evaluate whether an applied-for gTLD string requires one or more Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (Safeguard PICs) to be included in the Base RA). 2. In addition to the Mandatory Public Interest Commitments (PICs) that must be included in each Base RA, a subset of Base RAs must include Safeguard PICs based on ICANN’s Safeguard Assessment. See Section 7.8.2.3 Safeguard PICs. 3. Applying entities for TLDs that are not found to require Safeguard PICs can elect to add them to the applicable Base RAs voluntarily to, for example, further their business objectives, help address issues or concerns that are raised or could be raised with respect to their applications, or avoid the need for the evaluation and implementation of customized Registry Voluntary Commitment (RVC). See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs).
No
This question set collects information related to any Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) that the applying entity is submitting. The decision to submit an RVC is typically voluntary, except for those recognized by ICANN to resolve an objection or to address GAC Consensus Advice. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments for more information.
1. Select Yes or No. 2. In addition to Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (PICs), an applying entity will be permitted to propose one or more Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) to provide additional safeguards with regard to the registry operator’s operation of an applied-for gTLD string. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs). 3. RVCs are separate from Community Registration Policies. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) and Section 7.8.4 Community Registration Policies for more information. If you are applying for a Community gTLD, please submit the Community Registration Policies by answering Questions 150-155. However, if you propose to include additional Registry Voluntary Commitments in the RA beyond the Community Registration Policies, you may answer "yes" and proceed to answer the following questions. 4. You are encouraged to consider whether there are other means, separate from including commitment(s) in the Base RA, that could be used to further your business objectives or help resolve any anticipated or actual issue(s) raised regarding the applied-for gTLD string or application. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs). Notes: If you select “yes” to this question, you are required to pay the conditional Registry Commitments Evaluation fee, and commitments that are approved by ICANN will be included in Specification 11 of the applicable Base RA as specific voluntary public interest commitments as contractual obligations.
No
This question set collects information related to whether the applied-for gTLD string is a .Brand (see Section 7.3) or if the applying entity is seeking a Code of Conduct exemption (see Section 7.4).
Select Yes or No
Yes
Select Yes or No. Notes: If the applying entity selects “no,” it will be required to provide additional documentation describing which criteria is not met as well as a justification for the TLD to nonetheless qualify as a .Brand TLD.
Yes
Attach an accurate and complete copy of the applicable trademark registration that forms the basis of the request for .Brand TLD qualification.
Confirm statement with a checkbox.
true
Explain how the applying entity intends to operate the TLD such that there would not exist any such conflict with Section 3(d) of Specification 11.
Specification 11, Section 3(d) applies only where the applied-for string is a "generic string," meaning a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations, or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand. .nissin is not such a generic string. It is the applying entity's registered trademark, issued before the filing of this application, and is used by the applying entity and/or its affiliates in connection with the goods and services claimed by that registration. The string functions as a proprietary brand identifier, not as a dictionary or category term. The applying entity intends to operate .nissin as a single-registrant brand TLD under Specification 13, with domain registrations limited to the applying entity and its affiliates or other authorized brand users. That limitation is a legitimate brand-control and consumer-protection measure. It preserves the trademark's source-identifying function, reduces phishing, impersonation, and other abuse risks, and ensures that names in the TLD are associated with authorized .nissin purposes. Because .nissin is brand-distinctive and not generic, the exclusive-registration concern addressed by Specification 11, Section 3(d) is not implicated. The applying entity will observe the applicable mandatory Specification 11 safeguard public interest commitments, while relying on the Registry Operator Code of Conduct exemption available to qualifying Specification 13 brand TLDs under Specification 9, Section 6.
This question set collects any additional information that the applying entity would like to provide, including any supporting materials.
This question set contains attestations related to the applying entity’s acknowledgment of bona fide intent and prohibited communications.
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true