Last published on: 7 October 2026 at 15:37 UTC
This question set collects information regarding the legal entity that would enter into a Registry Agreement with ICANN upon successful completion of all relevant application processes. The information collected is intended to be used for background screening.
Provide the full legal name of the applying entity as it appears on the official registration documents. Do not use abbreviations.
CLOUD INTELLIGENCE ASSETS HOLDING (SINGAPORE) PRIVATE LIMITED
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the applying entity as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation. No additional information should be provided as this will be used for the automatic population of the Registry Agreement.
PRIVATE COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARES
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the applying entity is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the applying entity is registered. No additional information should be provided as this will be used for the automatic population of the Base Registry Agreement. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Singapore
Provide the website URL of the applying entity, if available.
https://www.alibabacloud.com
1. Choose Yes or No. 2. Use the definition of Affiliate from the Base Registry Agreement (see https://www.icann.org/en/registry-agreements/base-agreement).
true
1. Specify if the applying entity is an existing registry operator, ICANN accredited registrar, and/or an Affiliate of a registry operator and/or registrar. 2. If the applying entity is an Affiliate, provide the details of such Affiliate relationship, including the name of the affiliated registry operator and/or registrar. 3. If the applying entity is an ICANN accredited registrar, specify the registrar ID number.
Alibaba Group Holding Limited is the direct or Qualified Parent Entity (QPE) for the following entities that hold the following contractual relationships with ICANN: - Alibaba Group Holding Limited: Registry Operator .ALIBABA - Alibaba Group Holding Limited: Registry Operator .ALIPAY - Alibaba Group Holding Limited: Registry Operator .TMALL - Alibaba Group Holding Limited: Registry Operator .TAOBOA - Elegant Leader Limited: Registry Operator .XIN - Registrar #1: Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (IANA ID 420) - Registrar #2: Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina (net.cn) (IANA ID 1599) - Registrar #3: Dominet (HK) Limited (IANA ID 3775) - Registrar #4: Alibaba Cloud US LLC (IANA ID 3819)
Choose Yes or No.
false
1. Use the definition of Affiliate from the Base Registry Agreement (see https://www.icann.org/en/registry-agreements/base-agreement). 2. Provide the type of the provider and the name of the applicable entity of which the applying entity is an Affiliate.
Yes. Alibaba Cloud (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., an RSP that has cleared ICANN's Main, DNS, DNSSEC and Proxy evaluation, is an Affiliate of the applicant: both are under the common control of Alibaba Group Holding Limited, the applicant's Qualified Parent Entity. Neither controls the other.
1
Provide the primary business phone number without including the country code.
205-273-2361
Provide the primary business email address of the applying entity.
legal.cloud@alibabacloud.com
Enter the street address (no PO Box).
51 BRAS BASAH ROAD, #03-06, LAZADA ONE
Enter the city, village, municipality, etc.
SINGAPORE
Enter the state, province, department, territory, prefecture, oblast, etc., if applicable.
SINGAPORE
1. Enter the postal code, if applicable. 2. If a postal code does not exist, type “Not Applicable”.
189554
SG
If applicable, provide the full legal name as it appears on the official registration documents of the Direct Parent Company of the applying entity. Do not use abbreviations.
Cloud Intelligence (Cayman) Holding Limited
Provide the name under which the Direct Parent Company is doing business, if different from the full legal name answered in Question 26. Such a name must be registered with appropriate local jurisdiction or public authority.
N/A
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the Direct Parent Company as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation.
an exempted company with limited liability; Cayman Islands
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the Direct Parent Company is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the Direct Parent Company is registered. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Grand Cayman
If applicable, provide the full legal name as it appears on the official registration documents of the Ultimate Parent Company of the applying entity. Do not use abbreviations. "Ultimate Parent Company" means, with respect to an Applicant (and, if applicable, a Direct Parent Company), the top-level entity that directly or indirectly possesses the power to direct the management and policies of such Applicant (and, if applicable, a Direct Parent Company) through the ownership of voting securities, as a general partner, as a managing member, by contract, or otherwise. An Ultimate Parent Company is not controlled by any other entity. If there are no intermediary entities between the Applicant and the Ultimate Parent Company, the Ultimate Parent Company would be the same entity as the Direct Parent Company.
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
Provide the name under which the Ultimate Parent Company is doing business, if different from the full legal name answered in Question 36. Such a name must be registered with appropriate local jurisdiction or public authority.
N/A
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the Ultimate Parent Company as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation.
exempted company with limited liability
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the Ultimate Parent Company is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the Direct Parent Company is registered. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Grand Cayman
This question set collects information related to the individuals who will have access to TAMS, manage the application, and receive inquiries.
Yi Zhu
Yi Zhu
Cloud Intelligence (Cayman) Holding Limited
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q3.2-1. The document must include only the SC3.2-1.1, SC3.2-1.2, SC3.2-1.3 and SC3.2-1.4 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q3.2-1. 2. The document must include only the SC3.2-1.1 through SC3.2-1.4 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC3.2-1.1 through SC3.2-1.4 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC3.2-1.1 through SC3.2-1.4 statements.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question AGB Q220, Q5.1-1. The document must include only the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. If the applicant cannot Self-Certify SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q5.1-1. 2. The document must include only the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1.1-3 statements.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question AGB Q221, Q5.2-1. The document must include only the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. If the applicant cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q5.2-1. 2. The document must include only the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements.
This question set collects basic information regarding the string that is being applied for (for example, a-label, meaning, script). If the applying entity opts to designate a replacement string, it must answer the same set of questions for the replacement string from the AGB Question Set 5 on.
alicloud
Provide the meaning, or restatement of the string in English, that is, a description of the literal meaning of the string in the opinion of the applying entity. If there is no literal meaning in English (for example, a brand name or a proper noun without a translation) simply state "No English Translation"
A global cloud service brand
Provide a representation of the string according to the International Phonetic Alphabet.
/ˌɑː.liˈklaʊd/
Confirm the statement using a checkbox.
true
1. Describe the mission and purpose of the applied-for gTLD, including the intended registrants and users, and the related activities that have been or will be carried out to achieve this purpose. 1a. If applying for a variant of an existing gTLD, please also describe the mission and purpose of the existing gTLD, including the intended registrants and users, and the related activities that have been or will be carried out to achieve this purpose. 2. Explain how this purpose is sustainable over time.
Alibaba Cloud, also known as Alicloud, is a global provider of cloud computing and artificial intelligence services, established in 2009 as the digital technology arm of the Alibaba group. Alicloud delivers computing, storage, networking, database, security, data analytics and AI services to enterprises, public-sector organizations and developers from data centres in multiple regions worldwide. Its services are consumed almost entirely online, through web consoles, APIs, documentation portals and partner marketplaces, which makes the integrity of its domain namespace directly relevant to the security of customer workloads. The mission and purpose of the .ALICLOUD gTLD are to: (1) establish a trusted, hierarchical and intuitive namespace through which customers, developers and the public can identify and access authentic Alicloud information and services; (2) protect Alicloud's global online presence, brand identity, trademarks and other intellectual property rights; (3) provide a secure and authoritative channel for Alicloud's consoles, documentation, status reporting, customer support, marketing and developer-community activities; (4) improve navigation by providing short, memorable and recognizable Internet addresses associated exclusively with Alicloud and authorized initiatives; and (5) support Alicloud's continued innovation and international growth by creating a flexible platform able to accommodate new products, markets, collaborations and technologies. The .ALICLOUD gTLD is intended to function as an authoritative source identifier for Alicloud-related content and services. Internet users will be able to recognize that websites within the namespace are controlled by, affiliated with or expressly authorized by the Applicant. This trusted environment will help customers distinguish official Alicloud consoles, sign-in pages, documentation and support channels from unauthorized websites engaged in cybersquatting, phishing, credential theft, fraud, malware distribution or other harmful conduct - risks that are especially acute in cloud administration. Intended registrants are the Applicant and its affiliates. Intended users are Alicloud's enterprise, public-sector and developer customers, channel partners, independent software vendors, employees and members of the public seeking authoritative Alicloud information. The Applicant anticipates introducing the .ALICLOUD gTLD through a measured and controlled rollout. Initial registrations may be used for technical testing, corporate communications, product information, documentation, status reporting and customer support. Following successful implementation, the Applicant may expand the namespace to its affiliates, regional operations and appropriately authorized partners, licensees, service providers or collaborators, subject to applicable registration and use requirements. The Applicant has established internal naming governance, engaged an experienced Registry Service Provider and an ICANN-accredited registrar, and will apply uniform security requirements including DNSSEC and registry lock. This purpose is sustainable because it is tied to a long-established core business rather than to third-party registration demand. Alicloud has operated continuously since 2009 and the ALICLOUD brand is a durable asset the Applicant intends to use indefinitely. The registry cost base - ICANN, Registry Service Provider, registrar and compliance fees - is modest, predictable and funded from the Applicant's operating budget as brand and infrastructure expenditure, so viability does not depend on registration volumes or market conditions. The Applicant's Registry Service Provider meets the service levels of the Registry Agreement and provides data escrow and business continuity arrangements; the Applicant will maintain the required continued operations instrument and manages the TLD through a dedicated internal team under annual review.
This question set collects information related to determining whether certain Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (Safeguard PICs) are required for the applied-for gTLD string. See Section 7.8.2.3 Safeguard PICs. Answers to these questions will inform assessment by ICANN on whether and which Safeguard PICs must be incorporated in the applicable Registry Agreement (RA) if the string proceeds to delegation. The answers themselves will not automatically make such a determination.
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. I-2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. I-2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
Select Yes or No. Notes: 1. ICANN will evaluate whether an applied-for gTLD string requires one or more Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (Safeguard PICs) to be included in the Base RA). 2. In addition to the Mandatory Public Interest Commitments (PICs) that must be included in each Base RA, a subset of Base RAs must include Safeguard PICs based on ICANN’s Safeguard Assessment. See Section 7.8.2.3 Safeguard PICs. 3. Applying entities for TLDs that are not found to require Safeguard PICs can elect to add them to the applicable Base RAs voluntarily to, for example, further their business objectives, help address issues or concerns that are raised or could be raised with respect to their applications, or avoid the need for the evaluation and implementation of customized Registry Voluntary Commitment (RVC). See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs).
No
This question set collects information related to any Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) that the applying entity is submitting. The decision to submit an RVC is typically voluntary, except for those recognized by ICANN to resolve an objection or to address GAC Consensus Advice. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments for more information.
1. Select Yes or No. 2. In addition to Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (PICs), an applying entity will be permitted to propose one or more Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) to provide additional safeguards with regard to the registry operator’s operation of an applied-for gTLD string. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs). 3. RVCs are separate from Community Registration Policies. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) and Section 7.8.4 Community Registration Policies for more information. If you are applying for a Community gTLD, please submit the Community Registration Policies by answering Questions 150-155. However, if you propose to include additional Registry Voluntary Commitments in the RA beyond the Community Registration Policies, you may answer "yes" and proceed to answer the following questions. 4. You are encouraged to consider whether there are other means, separate from including commitment(s) in the Base RA, that could be used to further your business objectives or help resolve any anticipated or actual issue(s) raised regarding the applied-for gTLD string or application. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs). Notes: If you select “yes” to this question, you are required to pay the conditional Registry Commitments Evaluation fee, and commitments that are approved by ICANN will be included in Specification 11 of the applicable Base RA as specific voluntary public interest commitments as contractual obligations.
No
This question set collects information related to whether the applied-for gTLD string is a .Brand (see Section 7.3) or if the applying entity is seeking a Code of Conduct exemption (see Section 7.4).
Select Yes or No
Yes
Select Yes or No. Notes: If the applying entity selects “no,” it will be required to provide additional documentation describing which criteria is not met as well as a justification for the TLD to nonetheless qualify as a .Brand TLD.
Yes
Attach an accurate and complete copy of the applicable trademark registration that forms the basis of the request for .Brand TLD qualification.
Confirm statement with a checkbox.
true
Explain how the applying entity intends to operate the TLD such that there would not exist any such conflict with Section 3(d) of Specification 11.
CLOUD INTELLIGENCE ASSETS HOLDING (SINGAPORE) PRIVATE LIMITED intends to operate the applied-for top-level domain as a restricted, single-registrant namespace for the benefit of CLOUD INTELLIGENCE ASSETS HOLDING (SINGAPORE) PRIVATE LIMITED and its "Affiliates," as that term is defined in Section 2.9(c) of the applicable Registry Agreement. The applied-for string is a brand term used by CLOUD INTELLIGENCE ASSETS HOLDING (SINGAPORE) PRIVATE LIMITED and its Affiliates to identify and distinguish their own products and services. It is a coined compound built on the applicant group's house mark; it is not a dictionary word and it is not used as a descriptor. It is not a term that names or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations, or things. CLOUD INTELLIGENCE ASSETS HOLDING (SINGAPORE) PRIVATE LIMITED, directly or through its Affiliates, owns one or more trademark registrations for the applied-for string in jurisdictions in which it operates, consistent with its treatment and use of the term as a proprietary brand identifier. Accordingly, the applied-for string does not constitute a "Generic String" as defined in Specification 11 of the Registry Agreement. Because the restriction in Section 3(d) of Specification 11 applies only to top-level domains consisting of Generic Strings, that restriction is not applicable, and no conflict exists.
This question set collects any additional information that the applying entity would like to provide, including any supporting materials.
This question set contains attestations related to the applying entity’s acknowledgment of bona fide intent and prohibited communications.
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true