Last published on: 7 October 2026 at 15:36 UTC
This question set collects information regarding the legal entity that would enter into a Registry Agreement with ICANN upon successful completion of all relevant application processes. The information collected is intended to be used for background screening.
Provide the full legal name of the applying entity as it appears on the official registration documents. Do not use abbreviations.
Beijing Guoxu Network Technology Co., Ltd.
Provide the name under which the applying entity is doing business, if different from the full legal name answered in Question 1. Such a name must be registered with appropriate local jurisdiction or public authority.
Beijing Guoxu Network Technology Co., Ltd.
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the applying entity as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation. No additional information should be provided as this will be used for the automatic population of the Registry Agreement.
Limited Liability Company (Invested or Controlled by Natural Person(s))
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the applying entity is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the applying entity is registered. No additional information should be provided as this will be used for the automatic population of the Base Registry Agreement. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Beijing, China
Provide the website URL of the applying entity, if available.
https://www.xdns.cn/
1. Choose Yes or No. 2. Use the definition of Affiliate from the Base Registry Agreement (see https://www.icann.org/en/registry-agreements/base-agreement).
true
1. Specify if the applying entity is an existing registry operator, ICANN accredited registrar, and/or an Affiliate of a registry operator and/or registrar. 2. If the applying entity is an Affiliate, provide the details of such Affiliate relationship, including the name of the affiliated registry operator and/or registrar. 3. If the applying entity is an ICANN accredited registrar, specify the registrar ID number.
The applying entity is an existing ICANN accredited registrar (IANA ID:1494).
Choose Yes or No.
false
86
Provide the primary business phone number without including the country code.
01051192213
Provide the primary business email address of the applying entity.
overseas@guoxuwang.cn
Enter the street address (no PO Box).
No. 18 Zhongguancun East Road, Haidian District
Unit 02, 20F, Block C, Caizhi International Mansion, Building 1
Enter the city, village, municipality, etc.
Beijing
Enter the state, province, department, territory, prefecture, oblast, etc., if applicable.
Beijing
1. Enter the postal code, if applicable. 2. If a postal code does not exist, type “Not Applicable”.
100083
CN
This question set collects information related to the individuals who will have access to TAMS, manage the application, and receive inquiries.
Xiu Han, Yixin Li
Xiu Han, Beijing Guoxin Zhitou Network Technology Center
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q4.2-1. The document must include only the SC4.2-1.1, SC4.2-1.2, or SC4.2-1.3 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q4.2-1. 2. The document must include only the SC4.2-1.1 through SC4.2-1.3 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC4.2-1.1 through SC4.2-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC4.2-1.1 through SC4.2-1.3 statements.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question AGB Q220, Q5.1-1. The document must include only the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. If the applicant cannot Self-Certify SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q5.1-1. 2. The document must include only the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1.1-3 statements.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question AGB Q221, Q5.2-1. The document must include only the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. If the applicant cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q5.2-1. 2. The document must include only the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements.
This question set collects basic information regarding the string that is being applied for (for example, a-label, meaning, script). If the applying entity opts to designate a replacement string, it must answer the same set of questions for the replacement string from the AGB Question Set 5 on.
xn--uir314m
钱包
U+94B1 U+5305
Provide the meaning, or restatement of the string in English, that is, a description of the literal meaning of the string in the opinion of the applying entity. If there is no literal meaning in English (for example, a brand name or a proper noun without a translation) simply state "No English Translation"
.钱包 represents a personal digital wallet and digital asset management, providing internet users with an exclusive and intuitive Chinese digital identity for managing personal digital storage, credentials, and online assets.
If an IDN, provide the script of the string (both in English and as referenced by the RZ-LGR/ISO 15924)
Chinese (Han)
Provide a representation of the string according to the International Phonetic Alphabet.
/tɕjɛn pɑʊ/
Confirm the statement using a checkbox.
true
1. Describe the mission and purpose of the applied-for gTLD, including the intended registrants and users, and the related activities that have been or will be carried out to achieve this purpose. 1a. If applying for a variant of an existing gTLD, please also describe the mission and purpose of the existing gTLD, including the intended registrants and users, and the related activities that have been or will be carried out to achieve this purpose. 2. Explain how this purpose is sustainable over time.
1. Mission and Objectives of the .钱包 TLD (1) Mission The ".钱包" (Chinese for "wallet") is a personal digital asset namespace designed for global individual internet users. It focuses primarily on personal digital asset management, providing internet users with exclusive, intuitive, and Chinese digital identities to gather, present, and manage all types of personal online assets. The ".钱包" TLD enriches the diversity of the DNS ecosystem, promotes the UA of multilingual domains, and fully complies with ICANN’s core principles of Internet security, stability, and global public interest. (2) Objectives Personal Digital Asset Identification: Offer dedicated domain space for individuals to store and display full-spectrum personal digital assets, including digital collections, personal copyright works, online membership rights, virtual assets, digital certificates, personal cloud assets, and personalized digital portfolios. Digital Asset Transaction Scenario Building: Establish a credible, standardized personal digital asset trading portal for global internet users, realizing standardized online trading support for diverse digital assets. Lower Barriers for Individual Internet Users: Leverage the simple and intuitive Chinese word to eliminate language barriers, enabling ordinary users to own personal domains. Diversify Global DNS Ecosystem: Expand Chinese IDNs, enrich personalized domain resources in the global domain market. 2. Intended Registrants and Users Registrants: Global individual internet users, digital asset collectors, independent freelancers, personal brand operators, digital life enthusiasts, and internet users in all industries. End Users: Global internet visitors who browse, view, and verify personal digital assets, works, credential information, and digital portfolios of registrants. 3. Activities for Objective Realization Stable ICANN-Compliant Infrastructure: Maintain high-availability, fully redundant registry technical infrastructure with regular security audits and vulnerability inspections to sustain long-term stable DNS resolution for massive personal user access. Global Open Registration Channels: Cooperate with ICANN-accredited registrars worldwide to provide convenient, low-threshold, open registration services, ensuring universal public accessibility. Universal Acceptance Promotion: Continuously promote the compatibility and popularization of Chinese domains, advance UA implementation on mainstream browsers, search engines and internet platforms. Personal User Ecosystem Construction: Guide and encourage the use of ".钱包" domains for personal daily digital life management. Strict Anti-Abuse and Risk Control: Execute standardized Sunrise and Trademark Claims procedures, enforce UDRP and URS policies, and maintain real-time monitoring to prevent illegal abuse, fraud and malicious squatting, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of individual users. 4. Long-Term Sustainability Permanent Universal Personal Demand: With the continuous expansion of personal digital assets, individual demands for digital property sorting, personal identity aggregation and online asset display are long-term, rigid, and growing steadily, ensuring sustainable registration needs for the TLD. Wide Scenario Adaptability: The TLD is not limited to financial payment scenarios. It adapts to all personal digital life scenarios with strong market universality and anti-risk capability. Stable and Healthy Business Model: Sustainable revenue comes from public individual domain registrations and standardized value-added services for personal users. Sufficient financial reserves ensure long-term technical operation, security maintenance and ICANN compliance costs. Continuous Alignment with ICANN Public Interest Goals: The TLD continues to promote multilingual internet development, enrich personalized domain resources, protect individual user rights, and maintain fair and transparent domain market competition.
This question set collects basic information regarding any variants of the primary string (AGB Question Set 5) that are being applied for. Loop over multiple variant strings if the string has multiple variant strings.
xn--uirx50m
錢包
U+9322 U+5305
Provide the script of the variant string (both in English and as referenced by the RZ-LGR/ISO 15924)
Chinese (Han)
Select an option.
New TLD
Provide the meaning or intended meaning (for non-dictionary words) of each of the applied-for variant string(s), including sources. If there is no literal meaning in English (for example, a brand name or a proper noun without a translation) simply state "no English Translation/Meaning".
“.錢包” is the Traditional Chinese version of “.钱包”, meaning “wallet”, and represents the same personal digital wallet and digital asset management namespace with identical meaning, purpose, and intended use.
Provide at least three bona-fide examples to support the explanation. (for example, evidence of trademark use by showing real world use cases).
The primary applied-for string “.钱包” and its Traditional Chinese version “.錢包” represents the same Chinese lexical item. Both are standardized forms of written Chinese and are universally understood by Chinese-speaking communities to have the same pronunciation, semantic meaning, and conceptual reference. The distinction between the two strings exists solely because of the different writing systems adopted by different Chinese-speaking regions. Users in Chinese mainland generally use Simplified Chinese, whereas users in Hong Kong SAR, Macao SAR, Taiwan, and many overseas Chinese communities primarily use Traditional Chinese. Despite these orthographic differences, both user communities recognize the two strings as referring to the same concept. Consequently, users naturally perceive “.钱包” and “.錢包” as equivalent identifiers representing the same namespace in different writing systems. The relationship between Simplified and Traditional Chinese is well established within Unicode, IDNA implementation practices, and the Label Generation Rules (LGR) framework adopted for Chinese IDN variants. The introduction of the Traditional Chinese version does not introduce any semantic ambiguity but instead preserves linguistic consistency and improves usability across Chinese-speaking communities. Accordingly, we consider the two strings to be equivalent representations of the same TLD for linguistic, functional, and user-recognition purposes.
1. Applying entities shall explain why one label is insufficient and two or more labels are necessary to satisfy regional, linguistic, or cultural drivers. 2. Identify the user communities served by primary and for each of the variant TLDs. 3. How are these user community needs reflected by differences or similarities in the design of the IDN tables offered for the primary and the each variant TLD.
The introduction of the applied-for variant string “.錢包”(Traditional Chinese version of “.钱包”) will enhance accessibility, inclusiveness, and usability for Traditional Chinese-speaking internet users while maintaining full consistency with the primary applied-for string. Chinese is one of the world's most widely used languages and exists in two officially recognized writing systems. Supporting both Simplified and Traditional Chinese reflects established linguistic practice and enables users to interact with the domain name system in the writing system that they naturally use. This improves readability, recognition, and user confidence while reducing potential confusion arising from script differences. The “variant” string will primarily benefit individuals, organizations, businesses, educational institutions, digital service providers, and online communities that communicate primarily in Traditional Chinese, including users in Hong Kong SAR, Macao SAR, Taiwan, and overseas Chinese communities around the world. The availability of this string also supports the broader goals of Universal Acceptance (UA) by encouraging wider adoption of multilingual domain names and promoting equal access to the Domain Name System regardless of language or script preference. We believes that introducing the Traditional Chinese version contributes to a more inclusive, multilingual, and user-friendly Internet while preserving the security and stability of the DNS.
Provide steps and descriptions that adequately demonstrate all defined criteria are met. See Section 7.6 Variant String Evaluation and Section 3.1.9.2.1 Application Submission of New Primary IDN and its Variant Strings. Notes: Commitments made by an applicant to minimize the noted operational and management complexities will form the basis of contractual requirements to be included in the applicable Registry Agreement.
We will operate the primary string ".钱包" and its allocatable version ".錢包" in accordance with the principles established for Chinese IDNs, including the recommendations described in RFC 4713 (Registration and Administration Recommendations for Chinese Domain Names), the applicable Chinese Label Generation Rules (LGR), and relevant ICANN policies governing variant gTLDs. Consistent with long-established practices for Chinese domain names, we will implement the principles of Simplified–Traditional equivalence, unified registration, mandatory variant allocation, and no additional registration fee for reserved or bundled variants. Registrants registering either the Simplified or Traditional form will obtain the corresponding variant under a single registration relationship, thereby preventing conflicting registrations, reducing user confusion, and providing a consistent user experience across both writing systems. Both strings will be operated under a single registry management framework with identical Registry Policies, Registration Policies, Rights Protection Mechanisms, Acceptable Use Policies, and technical standards. Variant domain names will follow synchronized lifecycle management throughout registration, renewal, transfer, deletion, restoration, and expiration. We will implement variant management in accordance with the applicable Chinese LGR and ICANN requirements. Registry systems will maintain consistent registration data, DNS and DNSSEC configuration, EPP services, RDAP/WHOIS services, abuse mitigation procedures, and reporting processes across both the primary and variant strings. To minimize operational complexity for registrars, resellers, and registrants, we will provide unified technical documentation, implementation guidance, and policy information. Operational procedures, staff training, and change management processes will also be managed consistently across both strings to ensure interoperability, minimize user confusion, and preserve the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS.
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true
This question set collects information related to determining whether certain Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (Safeguard PICs) are required for the applied-for gTLD string. See Section 7.8.2.3 Safeguard PICs. Answers to these questions will inform assessment by ICANN on whether and which Safeguard PICs must be incorporated in the applicable Registry Agreement (RA) if the string proceeds to delegation. The answers themselves will not automatically make such a determination.
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. I-2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. I-2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
Select Yes or No. Notes: 1. ICANN will evaluate whether an applied-for gTLD string requires one or more Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (Safeguard PICs) to be included in the Base RA). 2. In addition to the Mandatory Public Interest Commitments (PICs) that must be included in each Base RA, a subset of Base RAs must include Safeguard PICs based on ICANN’s Safeguard Assessment. See Section 7.8.2.3 Safeguard PICs. 3. Applying entities for TLDs that are not found to require Safeguard PICs can elect to add them to the applicable Base RAs voluntarily to, for example, further their business objectives, help address issues or concerns that are raised or could be raised with respect to their applications, or avoid the need for the evaluation and implementation of customized Registry Voluntary Commitment (RVC). See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs).
No
This question set collects information related to any Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) that the applying entity is submitting. The decision to submit an RVC is typically voluntary, except for those recognized by ICANN to resolve an objection or to address GAC Consensus Advice. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments for more information.
1. Select Yes or No. 2. In addition to Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (PICs), an applying entity will be permitted to propose one or more Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) to provide additional safeguards with regard to the registry operator’s operation of an applied-for gTLD string. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs). 3. RVCs are separate from Community Registration Policies. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) and Section 7.8.4 Community Registration Policies for more information. If you are applying for a Community gTLD, please submit the Community Registration Policies by answering Questions 150-155. However, if you propose to include additional Registry Voluntary Commitments in the RA beyond the Community Registration Policies, you may answer "yes" and proceed to answer the following questions. 4. You are encouraged to consider whether there are other means, separate from including commitment(s) in the Base RA, that could be used to further your business objectives or help resolve any anticipated or actual issue(s) raised regarding the applied-for gTLD string or application. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs). Notes: If you select “yes” to this question, you are required to pay the conditional Registry Commitments Evaluation fee, and commitments that are approved by ICANN will be included in Specification 11 of the applicable Base RA as specific voluntary public interest commitments as contractual obligations.
No
This question set collects information related to whether the applied-for gTLD string is a .Brand (see Section 7.3) or if the applying entity is seeking a Code of Conduct exemption (see Section 7.4).
Select Yes or No
No
This serves as an indication of intent to apply for an exemption to Specification 9 and that the applying entity is NOT requesting to be designated a .Brand TLD, pursuant to Specification 13.
No
This question set collects any additional information that the applying entity would like to provide, including any supporting materials.
1. An applying entity may use this response field to submit any additional, optional information or documentation that the applying entity believes enhances understanding of its application or may be of interest to the general public. This could include, but is not limited to, the applying entity’s: a) Individual registry policies; b) Separate agreement with a third-party to fulfill certain commitments; c) Terms of use; d) Additional Community Registration Policies not intended for RA inclusion; e) Other materials that clarify the applying entity’s mission, values, or intended use of the gTLD. Notes: 1. This question is optional and for informational purposes only. 2. The information provided here will not be evaluated as part of the application, or be contractually binding on the applying entity. 3. All submissions to this question will be posted for the public to review and comment.
N/A
This question set contains attestations related to the applying entity’s acknowledgment of bona fide intent and prohibited communications.
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true