Last published on: 7 October 2026 at 15:21 UTC
This question set collects information regarding the legal entity that would enter into a Registry Agreement with ICANN upon successful completion of all relevant application processes. The information collected is intended to be used for background screening.
Provide the full legal name of the applying entity as it appears on the official registration documents. Do not use abbreviations.
Coinbase Technologies, Inc.
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the applying entity as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation. No additional information should be provided as this will be used for the automatic population of the Registry Agreement.
Corporation
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the applying entity is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the applying entity is registered. No additional information should be provided as this will be used for the automatic population of the Base Registry Agreement. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Delaware USA
Provide the website URL of the applying entity, if available.
https://www.base.org/
1. Choose Yes or No. 2. Use the definition of Affiliate from the Base Registry Agreement (see https://www.icann.org/en/registry-agreements/base-agreement).
false
Choose Yes or No.
false
1
Provide the primary business phone number without including the country code.
4152095329
Provide the primary business email address of the applying entity.
legalnotices@coinbase.org
Enter the street address (no PO Box).
248 3rd Street
#434
Enter the city, village, municipality, etc.
Oakland
Enter the state, province, department, territory, prefecture, oblast, etc., if applicable.
California
1. Enter the postal code, if applicable. 2. If a postal code does not exist, type “Not Applicable”.
94607
US
If applicable, provide the full legal name as it appears on the official registration documents of the Direct Parent Company of the applying entity. Do not use abbreviations.
Coinbase Global, Inc.
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the Direct Parent Company as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation.
Corporation
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the Direct Parent Company is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the Direct Parent Company is registered. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Texas
If applicable, provide the full legal name as it appears on the official registration documents of the Ultimate Parent Company of the applying entity. Do not use abbreviations. "Ultimate Parent Company" means, with respect to an Applicant (and, if applicable, a Direct Parent Company), the top-level entity that directly or indirectly possesses the power to direct the management and policies of such Applicant (and, if applicable, a Direct Parent Company) through the ownership of voting securities, as a general partner, as a managing member, by contract, or otherwise. An Ultimate Parent Company is not controlled by any other entity. If there are no intermediary entities between the Applicant and the Ultimate Parent Company, the Ultimate Parent Company would be the same entity as the Direct Parent Company.
Coinbase Global, Inc.
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the Ultimate Parent Company as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation.
Corproation
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the Ultimate Parent Company is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the Direct Parent Company is registered. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Texas
This question set collects information related to the individuals who will have access to TAMS, manage the application, and receive inquiries.
Jesse Pollack, Molly Abraham
Jesse Pollak, Molly Abraham, Sam Longair, Doug Sharp
Coinbase Global, Inc.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q3.2-1. The document must include only the SC3.2-1.1, SC3.2-1.2, SC3.2-1.3 and SC3.2-1.4 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q3.2-1. 2. The document must include only the SC3.2-1.1 through SC3.2-1.4 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC3.2-1.1 through SC3.2-1.4 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC3.2-1.1 through SC3.2-1.4 statements.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question AGB Q220, Q5.1-1. The document must include only the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. If the applicant cannot Self-Certify SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q5.1-1. 2. The document must include only the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1.1-3 statements.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question AGB Q221, Q5.2-1. The document must include only the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. If the applicant cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q5.2-1. 2. The document must include only the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements.
This question set collects basic information regarding the string that is being applied for (for example, a-label, meaning, script). If the applying entity opts to designate a replacement string, it must answer the same set of questions for the replacement string from the AGB Question Set 5 on.
base
Provide the meaning, or restatement of the string in English, that is, a description of the literal meaning of the string in the opinion of the applying entity. If there is no literal meaning in English (for example, a brand name or a proper noun without a translation) simply state "No English Translation"
“BASE” is a Coinbase trademark identifying the Base protocol, an open-source Ethereum Layer 2 network incubated by Coinbase, and its ecosystem. In English, “base” may mean a foundation or starting point, distinct from its specific use here.
Provide a representation of the string according to the International Phonetic Alphabet.
/beɪs/
Confirm the statement using a checkbox.
true
1. Describe the mission and purpose of the applied-for gTLD, including the intended registrants and users, and the related activities that have been or will be carried out to achieve this purpose. 1a. If applying for a variant of an existing gTLD, please also describe the mission and purpose of the existing gTLD, including the intended registrants and users, and the related activities that have been or will be carried out to achieve this purpose. 2. Explain how this purpose is sustainable over time.
Coinbase Technologies, Inc. is applying for and, if successful, will operate the .base gTLD as a stable, secure, and authoritative DNS namespace associated with the Base protocol, network, and ecosystem. Base is an open-source optimistic rollup and Ethereum Layer 2 network incubated by Coinbase and used for onchain applications, payments, digital-asset services, wallets, developer tools, and other Internet-based activity. “Base” is used in this application as the distinctive name of that specific protocol, network, and ecosystem, not as a term describing a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations, or things. Coinbase owns the BASE trademark registrations identified in this application, and its Affiliates use the mark under license. The mission and purpose of .base is to provide trusted and memorable Internet identities for official websites, applications, developer resources, products, services, communications, and other lawful online activities of Coinbase Technologies, Inc. and its Affiliates. The namespace will help Internet users identify and navigate to authoritative Base-related resources through the globally coordinated Domain Name System. All domain-name registrations in .base will be registered to and maintained by Coinbase Technologies, Inc. for the exclusive use of Coinbase Technologies, Inc. or its Affiliates. Registrations will not be sold, distributed, or transferred for the control or use of unaffiliated third parties. Intended users are members of the Internet public seeking to identify, discover, navigate to, or interact with authoritative Base-related resources, including developers, businesses, institutions, creators, consumers, and ecosystem participants. They may access and use resources in .base but will not be eligible registrants. This allocation model serves a substantive purpose. Digital-asset and payment services are frequent targets of impersonation and phishing, and deception involving those services can cause direct financial loss. Restricting every .base registration and usage to Coinbase Technologies, Inc. or its Affiliates prevents unaffiliated parties from registering names in the TLD and materially reduces the risk of registrant-based impersonation, rather than relying solely on detection and takedown after harm occurs. To achieve this mission and purpose, Coinbase Technologies, Inc. intends to work with its registry service provider and other service providers to support reliable registry operations, controlled domain-name allocation, DNS security, rights protection, data escrow, continuity, and DNS-abuse prevention and response. The applicant will establish internal registration, security, acceptable-use, and domain-management procedures appropriate for an authoritative corporate and technology namespace. This purpose is sustainable because .base supports an established protocol, network, and active technology ecosystem and is intended to form part of Coinbase’s long-term Internet, product, developer, and security infrastructure. Its operation will be supported by Coinbase Technologies, Inc. and its corporate group and will not depend on third-party registration volume, public domain sales, or short-term market demand.
This question set collects information related to determining whether certain Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (Safeguard PICs) are required for the applied-for gTLD string. See Section 7.8.2.3 Safeguard PICs. Answers to these questions will inform assessment by ICANN on whether and which Safeguard PICs must be incorporated in the applicable Registry Agreement (RA) if the string proceeds to delegation. The answers themselves will not automatically make such a determination.
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. I-2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. I-2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
Select Yes or No. Notes: 1. ICANN will evaluate whether an applied-for gTLD string requires one or more Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (Safeguard PICs) to be included in the Base RA). 2. In addition to the Mandatory Public Interest Commitments (PICs) that must be included in each Base RA, a subset of Base RAs must include Safeguard PICs based on ICANN’s Safeguard Assessment. See Section 7.8.2.3 Safeguard PICs. 3. Applying entities for TLDs that are not found to require Safeguard PICs can elect to add them to the applicable Base RAs voluntarily to, for example, further their business objectives, help address issues or concerns that are raised or could be raised with respect to their applications, or avoid the need for the evaluation and implementation of customized Registry Voluntary Commitment (RVC). See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs).
No
This question set collects information related to any Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) that the applying entity is submitting. The decision to submit an RVC is typically voluntary, except for those recognized by ICANN to resolve an objection or to address GAC Consensus Advice. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments for more information.
1. Select Yes or No. 2. In addition to Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (PICs), an applying entity will be permitted to propose one or more Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) to provide additional safeguards with regard to the registry operator’s operation of an applied-for gTLD string. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs). 3. RVCs are separate from Community Registration Policies. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) and Section 7.8.4 Community Registration Policies for more information. If you are applying for a Community gTLD, please submit the Community Registration Policies by answering Questions 150-155. However, if you propose to include additional Registry Voluntary Commitments in the RA beyond the Community Registration Policies, you may answer "yes" and proceed to answer the following questions. 4. You are encouraged to consider whether there are other means, separate from including commitment(s) in the Base RA, that could be used to further your business objectives or help resolve any anticipated or actual issue(s) raised regarding the applied-for gTLD string or application. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs). Notes: If you select “yes” to this question, you are required to pay the conditional Registry Commitments Evaluation fee, and commitments that are approved by ICANN will be included in Specification 11 of the applicable Base RA as specific voluntary public interest commitments as contractual obligations.
No
This question set collects information related to whether the applied-for gTLD string is a .Brand (see Section 7.3) or if the applying entity is seeking a Code of Conduct exemption (see Section 7.4).
Select Yes or No
No
This serves as an indication of intent to apply for an exemption to Specification 9 and that the applying entity is NOT requesting to be designated a .Brand TLD, pursuant to Specification 13.
Yes
Confirm statement with a checkbox.
true
Confirm statement with a checkbox.
true
Provide justification for why the Code of Conduct is not necessary to protect the public interest. This may include an explanation of how the TLD's operation under the exemption would serve the best interests of the registry operator, its stakeholders, and the broader Internet community, without adversely affecting the domain name ecosystem.
Application of the Registry Operator Code of Conduct to .base is not necessary to protect the public interest because the TLD will not have unaffiliated registrants requiring the protections that Specification 9 is intended to provide. Coinbase Technologies, Inc., as Registry Operator, will be the registrant of record for all domain-name registrations in .base and will maintain those registrations exclusively for its own use or the use of its Affiliates, as defined in the Base Registry Agreement. It will not sell, distribute, transfer, or otherwise provide control or use of any .base registration to a person or entity that is not an Affiliate. Base ecosystem developers, partners, customers, users, and other participants will not be eligible to control or use registrations merely because they participate in or maintain a relationship with the Base ecosystem. There will therefore be no public registration market, unaffiliated registrant class, or third-party registrant whose interests could be affected by preferential registrar access, registry self-allocation, use of registration data, or other differential treatment addressed by Specification 9. Domain names will be allocated and managed internally for the official websites, applications, developer resources, products, services, communications, and other lawful activities of Coinbase Technologies, Inc. and its Affiliates. Internet users may visit and interact with resources using .base names, but they will not become registrants or obtain control or use of registrations. The exemption will serve the public interest by allowing .base to operate as a controlled and authoritative namespace for the Base protocol, network, and ecosystem. Digital-asset, wallet, payment, and financial-technology services are frequent targets of impersonation, phishing, and fraudulent domain use. Restricting every .base registration to a single, identifiable corporate group will prevent unaffiliated parties from registering names within the TLD and materially reduce the risk that Internet users will mistake an unauthorized .base registration for an official Base or Coinbase resource. Centralized allocation will also support consistent security controls, domain-management practices, lifecycle management, and prompt response to abuse or compromise. The requested exemption is limited to Specification 9. Coinbase Technologies, Inc. will remain subject to all other applicable provisions of the Registry Agreement, ICANN Consensus Policies, technical and operational requirements, rights-protection mechanisms, DNS security and stability obligations, registration-data requirements, data escrow, continuity requirements, and DNS-abuse mitigation and response obligations. If Coinbase Technologies, Inc. later proposes to make .base registrations available for the control or use of unaffiliated third parties, it will first notify ICANN, relinquish the exemption as required, and comply with Specification 9 and all applicable launch and rights-protection requirements before implementing that change. Accordingly, Specification 9 would provide no material additional protection to registrants because the only registrants will be the Registry Operator and its Affiliates, while the exemption will facilitate the secure, accountable, and authoritative operation of .base without adversely affecting registrants, competition, or the broader domain-name ecosystem.
This question set collects any additional information that the applying entity would like to provide, including any supporting materials.
This question set contains attestations related to the applying entity’s acknowledgment of bona fide intent and prohibited communications.
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true