Last published on: 7 October 2026 at 15:34 UTC
This question set collects information regarding the legal entity that would enter into a Registry Agreement with ICANN upon successful completion of all relevant application processes. The information collected is intended to be used for background screening.
Provide the full legal name of the applying entity as it appears on the official registration documents. Do not use abbreviations.
SWU TeleNet GmbH
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the applying entity as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation. No additional information should be provided as this will be used for the automatic population of the Registry Agreement.
limited liability company
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the applying entity is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the applying entity is registered. No additional information should be provided as this will be used for the automatic population of the Base Registry Agreement. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Germany
Provide the website URL of the applying entity, if available.
https://www.swu.de
1. Choose Yes or No. 2. Use the definition of Affiliate from the Base Registry Agreement (see https://www.icann.org/en/registry-agreements/base-agreement).
false
Choose Yes or No.
false
49
Provide the primary business phone number without including the country code.
731 166 3167
Provide the primary business email address of the applying entity.
tld.ulm@swu.de
Enter the street address (no PO Box).
Karlstraße 1-3
Enter the city, village, municipality, etc.
Ulm
Enter the state, province, department, territory, prefecture, oblast, etc., if applicable.
Baden-Wuerttemberg
1. Enter the postal code, if applicable. 2. If a postal code does not exist, type “Not Applicable”.
89073
DE
If applicable, provide the full legal name as it appears on the official registration documents of the Direct Parent Company of the applying entity. Do not use abbreviations.
SWU Stadtwerke Ulm/Neu-Ulm GmbH
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the Direct Parent Company as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation.
limited liability company
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the Direct Parent Company is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the Direct Parent Company is registered. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Germany
If applicable, provide the full legal name as it appears on the official registration documents of the Ultimate Parent Company of the applying entity. Do not use abbreviations. "Ultimate Parent Company" means, with respect to an Applicant (and, if applicable, a Direct Parent Company), the top-level entity that directly or indirectly possesses the power to direct the management and policies of such Applicant (and, if applicable, a Direct Parent Company) through the ownership of voting securities, as a general partner, as a managing member, by contract, or otherwise. An Ultimate Parent Company is not controlled by any other entity. If there are no intermediary entities between the Applicant and the Ultimate Parent Company, the Ultimate Parent Company would be the same entity as the Direct Parent Company.
Stadt Ulm
Provide the long form (no acronyms) of the legal entity form/business structure of the Ultimate Parent Company as it appears on the official registration documents. If the original script of the legal entity form/business structure is not English, ONLY provide its official English translation.
Regional public authority
The jurisdiction indicates the location in which the business of the Ultimate Parent Company is registered for legal and financial purposes. This is either 1) a country name, or a 2) state/territory name, depending on where the Direct Parent Company is registered. Examples include "Delaware", "Germany", etc.
Germany
This question set collects information related to the individuals who will have access to TAMS, manage the application, and receive inquiries.
Henning Gerd Krone
Antonija Scheible, Katrin Breitinger
SWU Stadtwerke Ulm/Neu-Ulm GmbH
Henning Gerd Krone, Antonija Scheible, Katrin Breitinger
Stadt Ulm
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q4.2-1. The document must include only the SC4.2-1.1, SC4.2-1.2, or SC4.2-1.3 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q4.2-1. 2. The document must include only the SC4.2-1.1 through SC4.2-1.3 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC4.2-1.1 through SC4.2-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC4.2-1.1 through SC4.2-1.3 statements.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question AGB Q220, Q5.1-1. The document must include only the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. If the applicant cannot Self-Certify SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q5.1-1. 2. The document must include only the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1-1.3 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.1-1.1 through SC5.1.1-3 statements.
Provide a single document for Self-Certification question AGB Q221, Q5.2-1. The document must include only the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. If the applicant cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements.
1. Provide a single document for Self-Certification question Q5.2-1. 2. The document must include only the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements. 3. Do not modify any of the Self-Certification statements. 4. If the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements, provide a document that explains why the applying entity cannot Self-Certify the SC5.2-1.1 through SC5.2-1.7 statements.
This question set collects basic information regarding the string that is being applied for (for example, a-label, meaning, script). If the applying entity opts to designate a replacement string, it must answer the same set of questions for the replacement string from the AGB Question Set 5 on.
ulm
Provide the meaning, or restatement of the string in English, that is, a description of the literal meaning of the string in the opinion of the applying entity. If there is no literal meaning in English (for example, a brand name or a proper noun without a translation) simply state "No English Translation"
No English Translation
Provide a representation of the string according to the International Phonetic Alphabet.
/ˈʊlm/
Confirm the statement using a checkbox.
true
1. Describe the mission and purpose of the applied-for gTLD, including the intended registrants and users, and the related activities that have been or will be carried out to achieve this purpose. 1a. If applying for a variant of an existing gTLD, please also describe the mission and purpose of the existing gTLD, including the intended registrants and users, and the related activities that have been or will be carried out to achieve this purpose. 2. Explain how this purpose is sustainable over time.
Mission & Purpose The string "ulm" identifies one of Germany's historically significant cities, internationally recognized as the birthplace of Albert Einstein, former home to the tallest church steeple in the world, and a leading center of innovation, science, and technology in Baden-Württemberg. The mission of the .ulm gTLD is to establish a dedicated, trusted, and geographically meaningful digital namespace for the city of Ulm, its metropolitan area (“Innovationsregion Ulm”) and its community. The TLD will provide an inclusive namespace encompassing its residents, businesses, cultural institutions, public authorities, and civic organizations. The .ulm TLD is designed to serve as the authoritative digital home for everything and everyone genuinely connected to Ulm. The TLD provides a namespace that is immediately recognizable, locally anchored, and clearly distinct from generic alternatives such as .com, .de, or .org, none of which can convey the same geographic identity and community belonging that .ulm offers. Intended Registrants & Users The registrants will be mainly entities and individuals with a connection to the city of Ulm or the Ulm metropolitan region. This includes the City of Ulm, administrative bodies, local businesses, cultural and educational institutions such as Ulm University and Technische Hochschule Ulm, healthcare providers incl. Universitätsklinikum Ulm, civic associations, community groups, and individual residents wishing to express their local identity online. In addition, platforms and service providers supporting the Ulm community, such as regional event portals, and local media outlets are potential registrants, provided their registrations are consistent with the location-oriented character of .ulm. Related Activities To realize this mission, the registry will implement registration policies that preserve a strong connection to the Ulm region while remaining open to registrants. A Sunrise Period will protect existing trademark holders, followed by a phased General Availability launch. An Early Access Phase might be introduced to provide a privileged registration phase. Active outreach will be conducted in partnership with the City of Ulm, and local organizations. Early adoption by the city government itself will serve as a powerful anchor for public trust and awareness, like rathaus.ulm and buergerservice.ulm. Cultural flagships such as the Ulmer Münster and major events like Schwörmontag civic tradition are natural candidates for high-profile .ulm registrations that reinforce the TLD's local identity in the public consciousness. Sustainability Over Time The long-term sustainability of .ulm rests on structural foundations that are both geographic and civic in nature. Ulm is a constitutionally established German municipality (first mentioned in year 854) whose identity, governance, and community life are permanent. Ulm's status as a nationally recognized innovation hub, anchored by its university, the Science City Ulm initiative, and a strong cluster of technology and life sciences companies, ensures a growing and digitally active registrant base well into the future. Financially, the registry will operate on a stable registration and renewal fee model, as successfully demonstrated by comparable city TLDs such as .berlin, .hamburg, and .koeln. A well-governed, clearly scoped namespace with a loyal and locally invested registrant community is structurally positioned for consistent renewal rates and low registrant churn. The TLD .ulm will benefit from the accelerating digitization of local government, business, and civil society. As public services move online and civic identity increasingly manifests in digital spaces, the demand for a domain that instantly communicates "this is Ulm" will grow rather than diminish. The TLD's value to registrants increases as adoption deepens and create a self-reinforcing dynamic that sustains the namespace commercially and culturally well into the future.
This question set collects information specific to Geographic Name applications.
Select Yes or No.
Yes
Select Yes or No
Yes
Provide a description and examples of how the TLD will be used in relationship to the city name.
Framework for German geoTLDs Under the German Telecommunications Act (TKG), the administration of TLDs does not fall within the remit of the public Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur). The allocation and management of TLDs such as .de and .berlin are carried out independently and by private registry operators in Germany. For more than 30 years, registrants and Internet users have been accustomed to this model and would not assume that the registry operator is a public body. Marketing and Use of .ulm The .ulm TLD is designed to be the natural digital home for the city of Ulm, its metropolitan area and beyond. It’ is a clearly recognizable, geographically anchored namespace that gives businesses, institutions, residents, and civic organizations a way to signal their local roots instantly and authentically. Unlike generic alternatives such as .com or .de, a .ulm domain communicates not just what registrants do, but where they belong. The registry will anchor this promise in its generally open registration policies for registrants that are conneced to Ulm and its metropolitan region. Marketing will pursue two complementary tracks. On the institutional side, the registry will work closely with the City of Ulm, the IHK Ulm, local media, and anchor institutions to seed the namespace early with high-visibility, high-credibility domains — so that from day one, .ulm is associated with recognized names that residents and visitors already trust. On the public-facing side, targeted campaigns will reach local businesses, associations, and residents directly, making the case that a .ulm domain is more than a web address: it is a statement of local identity, accountability, and community commitment. Marketing channels might include but are not limited to digital advertising, social media, local print media, outdoor campaigns, and presence at regional trade fairs and business events. Crucially, the visual and narrative identity of Ulm — the silhouette of the Münster, the Einstein heritage, the Donau (Danube), the Schwörmontag tradition — will be woven into all campaign materials, creating an unmistakable link between the TLD and the city & region it represents. Government and Public Administration rathaus.ulm — the City of Ulm's central digital gateway for citizens buergerservice.ulm — online access to municipal services and administrative processes polizei.ulm — local police presence and public safety information Tourism and City Promotion visit.ulm — the city's official tourism and visitor information portal einstein.ulm — celebrating the life and legacy of Ulm's most famous son schwoermontag.ulm — Ulm's centuries-old civic oath ceremony and popular summer festival Business and Commerce handwerk.ulm — connecting local craftspeople with customers in the region invest.ulm — a portal for companies considering locating or expanding in the Ulm area ihk.ulm — the Chamber of Commerce Education and Research uni.ulm — the University of Ulm sciencecity.ulm — the joint innovation campus bringing together university, research, and industry studieren.ulm — a guide to studying and student life in Ulm Culture, Sport, and Community muenster.ulm — home of the world's tallest church steeple and its history theater.ulm — Theater Ulm, the city's main stage for drama, opera, and dance ssv.ulm — SSV Ulm 1846, the city's storied multi-sport club and football team Personal Identity and Portfolios bildwerk89.ulm — a local photographer presenting their portfolio to regional clients sio-architekten.ulm — an architect rooted in the Ulm building tradition physioplus.ulm — a physio office signalling local presence and trust Community Groups, Clubs, and Associations nachbarschaftshilfe-boefingen.ulm — a mutual aid network in the Böfingen neighbourhood freie-kinder.ulm — a parent-led childcare group reparaturcafe.ulm — a community space for repairing everyday items and reducing waste
This question set collects information related to determining whether certain Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (Safeguard PICs) are required for the applied-for gTLD string. See Section 7.8.2.3 Safeguard PICs. Answers to these questions will inform assessment by ICANN on whether and which Safeguard PICs must be incorporated in the applicable Registry Agreement (RA) if the string proceeds to delegation. The answers themselves will not automatically make such a determination.
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. 2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. I-2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
1. When answering the questions, apply criteria by considering the meaning of the requested TLD string in the following contexts: a. Literally as described in the application b. Literally in any other language in which the string is a recognized word or phrase. c. Informally in any language or regional variant, where alternative meanings exist. I-2. If the proverbial “reasonable person” who understands the relevant context believes that the question should be answered ‘yes’, then the answer is yes.
No
Select Yes or No. Notes: 1. ICANN will evaluate whether an applied-for gTLD string requires one or more Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (Safeguard PICs) to be included in the Base RA). 2. In addition to the Mandatory Public Interest Commitments (PICs) that must be included in each Base RA, a subset of Base RAs must include Safeguard PICs based on ICANN’s Safeguard Assessment. See Section 7.8.2.3 Safeguard PICs. 3. Applying entities for TLDs that are not found to require Safeguard PICs can elect to add them to the applicable Base RAs voluntarily to, for example, further their business objectives, help address issues or concerns that are raised or could be raised with respect to their applications, or avoid the need for the evaluation and implementation of customized Registry Voluntary Commitment (RVC). See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs).
No
This question set collects information related to any Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) that the applying entity is submitting. The decision to submit an RVC is typically voluntary, except for those recognized by ICANN to resolve an objection or to address GAC Consensus Advice. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments for more information.
1. Select Yes or No. 2. In addition to Safeguard Public Interest Commitments (PICs), an applying entity will be permitted to propose one or more Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) to provide additional safeguards with regard to the registry operator’s operation of an applied-for gTLD string. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs). 3. RVCs are separate from Community Registration Policies. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) and Section 7.8.4 Community Registration Policies for more information. If you are applying for a Community gTLD, please submit the Community Registration Policies by answering Questions 150-155. However, if you propose to include additional Registry Voluntary Commitments in the RA beyond the Community Registration Policies, you may answer "yes" and proceed to answer the following questions. 4. You are encouraged to consider whether there are other means, separate from including commitment(s) in the Base RA, that could be used to further your business objectives or help resolve any anticipated or actual issue(s) raised regarding the applied-for gTLD string or application. See Section 7.8.3 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs). Notes: If you select “yes” to this question, you are required to pay the conditional Registry Commitments Evaluation fee, and commitments that are approved by ICANN will be included in Specification 11 of the applicable Base RA as specific voluntary public interest commitments as contractual obligations.
No
This question set collects information related to whether the applied-for gTLD string is a .Brand (see Section 7.3) or if the applying entity is seeking a Code of Conduct exemption (see Section 7.4).
Select Yes or No
No
This serves as an indication of intent to apply for an exemption to Specification 9 and that the applying entity is NOT requesting to be designated a .Brand TLD, pursuant to Specification 13.
No
This question set collects any additional information that the applying entity would like to provide, including any supporting materials.
This question set contains attestations related to the applying entity’s acknowledgment of bona fide intent and prohibited communications.
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true
Confirm the statement using the checkbox.
true